K-GA44 FUEL DISPENSER

K-GA44 FUEL DISPENSER

Pump :Type Optional

Inlet Pressure :>=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.) :55±5

Suction Distance (m): 6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type: Optional

Accuracy :±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) :1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage : 110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle :Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition : -40~~+55degree

Control Type : Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset Function :Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter) :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price :0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price :0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer: 1~~9,999,999

Hose 4.5m

Weight 280kg

Dimension(L×W×H) : 1540*690*2210(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 29

the product vary largely and different performance and failure as well. The following just introduce some general methods to solve troubles. 3.1. Inefficient performance The bad separate capacity present as: large foam appears in oil indicat fuel dispenser or as refueling, accuracy is affected. Maintenance methods and procedure as followed. Firstly to check the nut and plug on strainer whether loose, whether leakage at joint face as stopping operation. If failure is still exists after solve the sealing problem of strainer cover, conduct next progress. Check whether pipeline leakage between tank and fuel dispensers. The check method is to disconnect the end cover of strainer, and to find whether exist oil in low pressure chamber; if no oil or oil level go down slowly, there is some leaking places in pipeline or bottom valve. Inspect exhausting valve seat. Open upper cover and inspect the small hole at exhausting valve seat whether stuck. If the hole is stuck or narrowed by waste, oil indicator would appear much foam due to air leaking into vapor separate chamber. The method to solve trouble is that dredge hole and clean groove, making enough area. Note that the area should don’t too large, large room easily causes leaking oil at exhausting pipe. Check vapor separate chamber. Under normal condition oil level in the chamber should keep a half capacity so that ensure air can’t reach into low pressur fuel dispenser e chamber. (Different products with various oil level). If there is no oil or low level in vapor separate chamber, the taper valve would not plug the hole of return oil valve seat, so as air reaching into low pressure chamber via taper valve and returned oil valve. The solution is that inspecting the axis of returned valve and the hole of returned oil valve seat. Reassembling them after solve problems. 3.2. Exhaust pipe leakage When tank position is higher than that of fuel dispenser, exhausting pipe will leak oil. Plugging exhausting pipe could solve leakage phenomenon. If found leakage on tank the following procedure fuel dispenser

Page 95 of 146　　12. APPENDIX E - XML SERVICE REQUEST　　ServiceRequest.xsd　　 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?　　 xs:schema targetNamespace=www.nrf-arts.orgIXRetailnamespace　　xmlns:IFSF=www.ifsf.org fuel dispenser xmlns:xs=www.w3.org2001XMLSchema xmlns=www.nrf-　　arts.orgIXRetailnamespace elementFormDefault=qualified attributeFormDefault=unqualified　　version=1.0　　 xs:include schemaLocation=DR_BasicTypes.xsd　　 xs:include schemaLocation=DR_CurrencyCode_Full.xsd　　 xs:include schemaLocation=IFSF_BasicTypesCards.xsd　　 xs:include schemaLocation=IFSF_LanguageCode_Full.xsd　　 xs:element name=ServiceRequest　　 xs:annotation　　 xs:documentation IFSF POS Sell to EPS interface xs:documentation　　 xs:annotation　　 xs:complexType　　 xs:sequence　　 xs:element name=POSdata　　 xs:complexType　　 xs:sequence　　 xs:element name=POSTimeStamp　　type=xs:dateTime　　 xs:element name=ShiftNumber minOccurs=0　　 xs:simpleType　　 fuel dispenser xs:restriction　　base=xs:integer　　 xs:totalDigits　　value=3　　 xs:restriction　　 xs:simpleType　　 xs:element　　 xs:element name=ClerkID minOccurs=0　　 fuel dispenser

-performing loans (NPLs) added up to $911 billion. This is more than five-and-a-half times the latest government estimate of $164 billion, published in March. The report deemed the country s big four state-owned banks, which are trying to attr fuel dispenser act international investors, to be carrying $358 billion of bad loans, almost three times the official tally. The People s Bank of China, the country s central bank, quickly attacked the research as “ridiculous and barely understandable� This week an embarrassed Ernst & Young withdrew it, admitting that it was “factually erroneous� and that it had somehow slipped through the firm s normal checks. Ernst & Young says it plans to publish a revised version in due course. The authorities savage reaction is easy to understand. Other commentators and consultants have published estimates of China s NPLs ranging from $300 billion to $500 billion without attracting similar condemnation. Ernst & Young s estimate stood out not only for its size but also for its timing. The central bank s rebuttal came on the very day that Bank of China, the second of the big four to attempt a stockmarket listing in Hong Kong, began its investor roadshow. Bank of China plans to raise $9.9 billion, even more than the $9.2 billion pulled in by China Construction Bank, which was floated last October. A third big bank, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, hopes f fuel dispenser or $10 billion in September. Awkwardly, Ernst & Young is this institution s auditor—and as such had subscribed to the official, much lower estimate of bad loans. Even so, the firm s categorical withdrawal of its research looks like an overreaction. The report was more than a compilation of historic bad debts; drawing on work by other organisations, it also made a stab at estimating the new NPLs that will result from a lending spree between 2002 and 2004. These account for most of the difference between Ernst & Young s figures and the official ones. And they are particularly relevant now that the mainland is i fuel dispenser